- Riding the Wave
- Posts
- πAI is a catastrophic danger
πAI is a catastrophic danger
UK, US, EU and China all agreed: AI is dangerous. What's next?
Hello my dear AI-loving friendsπ!
We did it! We talked so much about it, that Collins Dictionary has named βAIβ as its word of the year. However, you might need to look it up under 'grave danger' in the synonyms section. At least according to our global leaders who signed the so-called Bletchley declaration today, stating thereβs a potential for catastrophic harm caused by AI.
Hereβs your two minutes of AI news for the day:
THE ONE IMPORTANT STORY
πUK, US, EU and China sign Bletchley declaration on AI. What's next?
The London AI Safety Summit has kicked off, with 28 countries β including the big shots β signing a declaration on AI. Even with the current AI chip drama, both China and the US have signed it. That's a solid win for global teamwork on AI rules.
So what did the declaration say?
AI is dangerous: It can cause catastrophic harm.
We should cooperate.
The world seems to agree that we should have some guardrails on AI.
Future safety summits have been set up to continue discussions. The next one will be virtual, hosted by South Korea in six monthsβ time and the participants will meet in person again next year in France.
But the challenge? Pinning down the specifics of these global AI rules and deciding who sets them. The EU is pushing its AI Act, and the US just kicked off its AI Safety Institute. Both are aiming to set a standard they hope others might follow.
Meanwhile, the G7's brainstorming on AI collaboration, and the UN's recently formed an advisory team to do the same.
How about AI for the military?
US Vice President Kamala Harris announced a new declaration regarding the use of AI in the military. 30 countries are in, but mostly it's the Western crew, hinting at a potential AI divide.
The declaration highlights:
Being open about AI developments for military.
Using AI responsibly and encouraging others to do the same.
The bottom line? There's a shared concern about AI's potential pitfalls, however whether countries agree on global AI rules is a big question. The issue is the same as with climate change. Until countries stand to gain from ignoring the threat, itβs hard to convince everyone to adhere to the same rules.
ONE MORE THING
A friendly reminder: if you havenβt tried GPT-4, you might not know where AI is at right now.
Giving a talk to 80 high-performing innovation managers & everyone had tried ChatGPT⦠but only 2 had used GPT-4.
I increasingly see this as the barrier to AI adoption. People use Bard or free ChatGPT & come away with a bit of a shrug. They donβt understand what they are missing
β Ethan Mollick (@emollick)
4:39 PM β’ Oct 26, 2023
β If you have one more minute
π€ Qualcommβs annual tech summit left the Verge reporter confused about the future
π¬ AI nearly twice as good at grading severity of rare cancer than current methods
π€ LinkedIn launches new AI chatbot to help you get a job
AI Art of the Day π¨
Harry Potter Kung Fu. Check out the whole collection, Hagrid is my fave. Imagined by Midjourney user u/vaddymusic.
πππππππππππππππππππππππ
That's all for today, folks!
If you liked it, please share this hand-crafted newsletter with a friend and make this writer happy!